22 Jan
Posted by: Steve Andreas in: Articles, NLP Methods, NLP Trainings, Tidbits
Recently I was exasperated by someone who didn’t keep what I thought was an agreement between us. But “Exasperation” doesn’t fully express the intensity of the confusion and disorientation I felt when that happened, so I decided to explore it using Andy Austin’s Metaphors of Movement process. Connirae and I have been having a great time with this model, both as a way of helping others find solutions to difficulties, and also on occasion guiding each other.
I explained to Connirae, “It’s like they pulled the rug out from under me.” My image was that I was standing on a small rug, about 3 feet wide, and 6 feet long. Someone else was holding onto the end in front of me, and they jerked it literally out from under me. When that happened I tumbled backwards, flailing, into a tank of some kind of fluid that had been beneath the rug. The broken agreement was disappointing, but tumbling and flailing into the fluid was what created my confusion and disorientation.
Connirae said, “So you’re a person who stands on your agreements.” “Definitely!” I said. This was true both literally and figuratively. It’s always been important to me to keep my commitments.
At first I didn’t see a way out — except for the other person not to yank the rug!
At his last training, Andy Austin said, “We usually see clearly what other people can do to “solve” their metaphoric situation, but we often don’t see what we can do in our own.” This is the value of working with a partner, and it certainly held true for me in this situation. Connirae suggested that I explore taking a step to the left, or to the right, or back — just off the carpet — to see what that would be like. “You’ll be standing by your agreements instead of on them,” she said. Initially, I didn’t like the idea. It wasn’t being true to my commitments in the way I was familiar with, but I wanted to explore it.
What if I “stood behind” my agreements? What if I “stood by” my agreements? In my metaphor, there was just solid ground on all sides of the rug, so this had potential. As I tried out these different ways of “standing” within the metaphor, I decided that standing behind an agreement fit best for me. I could do this with integrity, and my position was definitely more stable. (I could also have explored what it would be like to “sit on an agreement” or be more ready to “leap aside” if the rug was pulled out, etc.)
When I tried out that new stance in the real-life context of the agreement that hadn’t been kept, it felt much better, because I remained standing when the rug was pulled out. Without the flailing and splashing, and the resulting disorientation and confusion, it was much easier to focus on what to do about the broken agreement itself.
As most of us do with our problems, I had been feeling like a victim, and focused on what someone else did, rather than on what I was doing. Within the metaphor, I could quickly realize what I was doing, and experiment with more useful alternatives. It is one thing to know, as a general principle, that I can only really change what I am doing, and that if I feel like a victim, I am probably missing what I can do in a situation. It is quite another to explore a metaphor, and find out what I can actually do differently.
One of the really lovely things about using Metaphors of Movement with a client is that I don’t have to know anything about the real-life event that the metaphor represents.
Full Disclosure: It’s not always as easy to find a metaphoric solution that works as in this example. But this time it was.
Have you ever experienced someone breaking an agreement with you? . . . If you ask the question, “What is that like?” what is your answer?. . .
And if you’d like to, you can go on to explore your metaphor in more detail as I did above. Does anything become clear to you that you might prefer to do differently?
You can share your answer by making a comment below.
Andrew T. Austin will be in Boulder, CO teaching Metaphors of Movement on April 20-23, 2012.
Click Here to learn more. Save $80 with Early Registration!
22 Responses
Nick Kemp
23|Jan|2012 1Thanks for this story. I use metaphor exploration extensively when working with clients and Andy’s MOM has been an invaluable resource for my own work. Andy’s approach is highly effective and has refined my own thinking as well as being great fun to use. I’ll be standing behind that statement too!
Steve Green
23|Jan|2012 2Hi Steve
Q? Have you tested this yet to see if you now have a different
response to the initial trigger?
Steve
Kirk VandenBerghe
24|Jan|2012 3When I asked myself the “What is that like?” question, what came to mind is that it’s like getting punched in the stomach. The most generative frame I’ve been able to come up with (so far) is that I need to keep my guard up, along with keeping a little more distance. That generates a values objection for me, since I appreciate deep and meaningful connections with people. More work to do.
Very helpful article. Thank you, Steve.
Steve Andreas
24|Jan|2012 4Steve,
Yes, it has been tested, and my response is very different, and Connirae also noticed the difference.
–Steve
Duff
24|Jan|2012 5Kirk,
If it feels like getting punched in the stomach, then is the person in front of you?
If so, I wonder if would be helpful to turn things around, so that you can be by their side, or maybe even step behind them so you’ve got their back.
Kirk VandenBerghe
25|Jan|2012 6@Duff, spatial sorting tends to be a driver for me, so I will play with this. Thanks for your insightful suggestion.
Two Great Trainings! Earlybird Discounts by Steve Andreas’ NLP Blog
27|Jan|2012 7[...] last blog post gave you an example of Metaphors of Movement in action. However, there’s a LOT more to it than can be conveyed in a short blog. You’ll have the [...]
Two Great Trainings! Earlybird Discounts by … – Real People Press | My Blog
27|Jan|2012 8[...] last blog post gave you an example of Metaphors of Movement in action. However, there’s a LOT more to it than can be conveyed in a short blog. You’ll have the [...]
Donald Pelles
02|Feb|2012 9I had a weight client, she felt stuck in many aspects of her life, not just being unable to consistently take weight off. I asked her “what is it LIKE for you,” and she said, “It’s like I’m one of those old-fashioned office phones, with the ‘on hold’ button permanently pushed.” Releasing the button didn’t work for her — “The phone can’t push it’s own button,” she said. We worked at it for some time, but never did come up with a solution to that one.
Duff
02|Feb|2012 10Interesting Don. I wonder how a provocative approach would work here.
“Well I guess it’s not your fault then. When somebody pushes your buttons there’s just nothing you can do about it, right? But then again, even when people push our buttons, some people can still make the calls in their own life.”
Kirk VandenBerghe
02|Feb|2012 11@Don, I’m wondering if “permanently” was a fixation agent. Perhaps some reframing around the permanence-impermanence duality could be helpful.
Donald Pelles
02|Feb|2012 12Duff — I like it.
Kirk –
Please say more. I’m not really sure what a “fixation agent” is. How might I reframe the permanence-impermanence duality? Like, “Really, isn’t EVERYTHING impermanent?” or “It can be hard to tell, what is permanent and what is impermanent, because we really can’t know the future. Many things that SEEM permanent are not — they can change surprisingly quickly, with the right conditions, and things that seem impermanent can last a lot longer than anyone expected.”
Kirk VandenBerghe
03|Feb|2012 13@Don, “fixation agent” isn’t NLP jargon, just something I made up. I like the reframes you came up with. In addition, she could chunk down from the conceptual to the more tangible and just bring in a repairwoman to fix the phone! Of course, we’re talking weight loss and her seeming helplessness may just be “secondary gain” in continuing with her current health (or lack thereof) habits.
Steve Green
03|Feb|2012 14“a repairwoman to fix the phone” is still conceptual. And, having taken Andy’s very first Metaphor’s training in the UK I am sure I remember him saying that using outside agents to alter something like a stuck position is either not viable or will not work, I think.
I would be interested to read more feedback from Donald regarding the client as from my experience exploration and updating of metaphors can happen after the initial elicitation, even if as in this case, the stuck state wasn’t resolved.
Donald Pelles
03|Feb|2012 15It’s been 4 months or so since I have seen her. I do shoot her information from time to time, so I COULD email her a belated reframe. Mainly, I was not able to come up with anything effective at the time, and it’s been bugging me ever since.
Steve Green
03|Feb|2012 16Hi Donald,
Thank you for the update.
I don’t know if you have taken the MOM training (shoudl really be analogies, but that’s me being pedantic).
Andy defined “what stops you?” as either:
1). being held back; or
2). being prevented from moving on
Here are some ideas that occured to me that may or may not be of help.
In Duff’s comment, Duff assumes that it is other people pushing her button(s).
I think there are a few distinctions that need to be clarified.
1). Who/what pushed the button in the first place
2). Is the button being pushed externally or pulled internally
From your comment It sounds like somebody else pushed the button initially re: the client’s comment “The phone can’t push it’s own button,” it may well be that if someone or something as responsible for pushing the button in the first place, who/whatever ‘it’ was may be an metaphor/analogy for something else in her life.
Also, is the telephone metaphor used for all aspects of her life where she feels stuck?
I hope some of that might help.
Steve Green
03|Feb|2012 17Also Donald…
This thing that’s being bugging you ever since… what’s it like? lol
Danny
03|Mar|2013 18Don, re: the weight client. According to MoM model: She isn’t a phone (I think we can all agree with that). She is watching the phone. And it’s an old-fashioned office phone. This has identity implications.
Danny
03|Mar|2013 19p.s. MoM has so many distinctions it’s really something that I’d recommend learning if you’re interested in metaphorical communication. Because I’ve always been interested in stories, mythology and dreams and stuff I really immersed myself in learning MoM, and it has been the most radical thing I’ve learned in terms of hearing what people are saying and being able to respond. There are usually two people who are not aware of the meaning of a communication – the listener. And the speaker!
I also have the opportunity to use this model with clients similar to Andy Austin’s – people with psychiatric diagnoses who’ve been in chronic states sometimes for years. The results are better than I can put into words. Let’s be realistic – people in these kinds of situations have a lot of work to do, but they cannot begin to do that work until they have e.g. escaped the prison cell that’s accommodated them for 15 years. MoM allows people to escape within a conversation. And of course, it can help them explore the next step once they are out.
Menachem Schloss
03|Mar|2013 20I recently had a client with quite serious anger issues. The way he put it was “each time my wife tells me off, I feel like I am pushed into a corner and I have nowhere to go “…I asked him what stops him from stepping out of the corner?…he said “there’s an ugly rubber fence in front of me, that stops me from going anywhere”.
He would sit in the corner for a while until at some point he would explode his way out…
Any suggestions?
Andy Austin
05|Mar|2013 21Seems that the boundaries that bock him are somewhat flexible and quite ugly. It’s all he has to look forward to, so he stays backed into the corner. He can’t back out of the situation he is in, and since he is quite explosive, it seems to me that trapping him out of the way and into the corner is a sensible thing. I’d like to congratulate his wife’s strategy.
The only thing that is missing is his dunce cap, he is certainly behaving like the dunce so I figure he might as well wear the uniform of a dunce.
The other thing is that fence. I’m guessing that when he is in the corner, there is no one on his side [of the fence]. He is on his own, but he has…(wait for it) da-fence! He’s defenced.
Another possibility that springs to mind is that he’s been herded into the corner much like a sheep, and he might spend a lot of time bleating about it. It’s all a bit wooly of course. He’s be treated much like livestock – a resource, who’s actual identity and independence is largely irrelevant. He’s just there to provide and get pushed around.
Menachem Schloss
06|Mar|2013 22I think the sheep metaphor you used made more sense with my client.
I told him that it was inevitable.. and that his wife will carry on behaving this way…I guessed that was partly the reason he married her…I told him he just has to work out what he can do to make himself more comfortable in the corner..
Leave a reply
Search the Blog
About
This blog contains NLP articles and news from Steve Andreas, NLP author, trainer, and developer.
If you enjoy these articles, please visit the Real People Press NLP bookstore for great books, CDs, and DVDs on personal change, therapy, and communication.
Recent Posts
Categories
A design creation of Design Disease
Copyright © 2008 - Steve Andreas’ NLP Blog - is proudly powered by WordPress
InSense 1.0 Theme by Design Disease brought to you by HostGator Web Hosting.